Israel's 3 options for responding to Iranian attack: CFR president

Iran launched a ballistic missile attack against Israel last week, escalating fears of rising tensions in the Middle East if Israel were to retaliate. Michael Froman, president of the Council on Foreign Relations and former US trade representative during the Obama administration, joins Catalysts to discuss his outlook on this development.

Froman acknowledges that the US government understands "Israel feels the need to retaliate." He outlines three potential if Israel were to retaliate. Michael Froman, president of the Council on Foreign Relations and former US trade representative during the Obama administration, joins Catalysts to discuss his outlook on this development.future Iranian activity."

Regarding oil (CL=F, BZ=F) prices, which have seen a "modest" increase due to the conflict, Froman points out that "we have to remember they're under $80 a barrel which is pretty modest considering all the tensions in the Middle East." Given this context, he suggests that if Israel were to retaliate, "there's still room to the upside" for oil prices.

When asked about which US presidential candidate — Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump — would be better equipped to handle the conflict, Froman states, "I think with regard to the Middle East there's actually a fair amount of continuity between the two." He adds, "both are gonna stand firmly in support of Israel and its security and making sure that it has what it needs to achieve that."

For more expert insight and the latest market action, click here to watch this full episode of Catalysts.

This post was written by Angel Smith

Advertisement