Acu Petroleo Luxembourg S.A R.L. -- Moody's affirms Açu Petroleo's Ba2 rating, stable outlook

In this article:

Rating Action: Moody's affirms Açu Petroleo's Ba2 rating, stable outlookGlobal Credit Research - 08 Feb 2022New York, February 08, 2022 -- Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") has today affirmed the Ba2 rating of the senior secured notes issued by Açu Petróleo Luxembourg S.À R.L. ("Issuer") and guaranteed by Açu Petroleo S.A.'s ("Company", "Açu Petroleo") in the amount of $600 million and final legal amortization in 2035. The outlook is stable.Affirmations:..Issuer: Acu Petroleo Luxembourg S.A R.L.....Gtd Senior Secured Global Notes, Affirmed Ba2RATINGS RATIONALEThe rating affirmation follows Açu Petroleo's proposal to execute an additional Eligible Credit Instrument ("ECI") in the amount of $250 million which, in addition to another initial $350 million ECI.In our view, the issuance of the proposed Eligible Credit Instrument ("ECI") does not materially impact the key credit drivers and brings some cash flow gains leading to an average DSCR of 2.0x above our 1.8x prior base case. Nonetheless, we recognize the new structure is more complex and adds counterparty and currency risk which is mitigated by the credit quality of the facilities providers as well as the liquidity reserves embedded in the project finance structure. Counterparty risk is also mitigated by (i) short-lived exposure of about 3 days (between Guarantor´s transfer date and receivable by the Issuer); (ii) The 6 months DSRA pre-funded cash reserve within the project that would cover for a delay scenario; (iii) the counterparties are local financial institutions rated by Moody´s above the Note´s rating.Açu Petroleo's Ba2 rating incorporates the port's strong asset features, as the only private terminal of oil transshipment in the country, which is strategically located near to pre-salt reserves and mature fields in Campos and Santos Basin. Given the favorable market position the company will benefit from future increases in Brazil's offshore oil production. Moody's view is that Brazil's exports of crude oil production will grow significantly over the medium-term with oil prices in the range of $50-$70/barrel (bbl), coupled with limited domestic refining capacity and no significant increase in utilization rates forecasted. At the same time, Moody's expects Brazil's oil production to grow even in a scenario of lower oil prices (e.g. $40/bbl), given the relative lower breakeven prices on pre-salt oil fields, as well as a slew of projects under development.The project finance debt structure provides additional protections to creditors that further support the rating, such as a fully amortizing debt structure that yields to an average DSCR of 2.0x over the life of the transaction; 6-month DSRA and OMRA funded with cash at closing (could be replaced by eligible letters of credit non-recourse to the Company or subordinated to the senior rated debt); rights on future receivables, pledge of the port's assets (primary physical assets are the jetty, breakwater and related infrastructure) and shares of the Açu Petroleo to ensure step-in rights under an event of default. The structure also encompasses a clear cash sweep mechanism for target amortization payments in the event of excess cash generation, along with distribution tests and limitations on the incurrence of additional debt. Nonetheless, the debt structure allows for the issuance of additional debt and incorporation of subsidiaries under certain scenarios that could constrain the rating in the future. Still, any further leverage or acquisition is subject to certain financial covenants and ratings affirmation. Moody's Base Case rating scenario considers an additional debt issuance of about $75 million for port expansion in connection with the Company's "access channel" expansion, which could be triggered around 2028 once historical DSCR reaches the minimum threshold of 1.50x and average volume levels of 800,000 barrels per day in the preceding twelve-month period.The rating is also constrained by the exposure to revenue volatility due to the lack of long-term take-or-pay contracts and partially contracted structure during the life of the transaction. The port is exposed to re-contracting risk and ultimately to the volatility in oil prices, as the majority of the existing transshipment operations agreements will be expired by 2023. The longer contract in the portfolio is with Shell Plc (Aa2 stable), but it is expected to gradually decrease from 55% of total revenues in 2022 to 10% by 2036 in Moody's Base Case scenario.Also, the port's ownership structure encompass contractual arrangements under which Açu Petroleo is subject to a Port Access Contract with rights to use of port facilities held by Ferroport Logistica Comercial Exportadora S.A. ("Ferroport") subject to a fee payment. Both companies share the dredging costs. Still, the priority of use of port facilities remains with Ferroport, which apply exclusively for the vessel traffic on the access channel (i.e, iron ore vessels have priority over oil tankers to inbound/outbound maneuvers). Under certain conditions, Anglo American Minerio de Ferro Brasil ("AAMFB"), 50% owner of Ferroport iron ore terminal, has the right to obtain an injunctive relief in aid of an arbitration procedure to require Açu Petroleo to modify or suspend shipments activities. Despite this contractual weakness, Moody's views the likelihood of this happening is reduced given the economic incentives in the contractual relationship between the two companies and comprehensive contractual features that mitigate the risk of AAMFB from taking an unreasonable action to halt Açu Petroleo's activities.Moody's does not consider ESG risks as key drivers of this rating action. Environmental risks are mitigated by the licenses and the complexity of the ports operation at the same time Brazilian oil production remains attractive in the medium-term due to the low breakeven cost of the pre-salt exploration. At the same time, the off -- takers profile and exportation diversification minimizes exposure to social risks. Finally, governance considerations represent a low risk, given the underlying contractual features and the overall protections embedded in the proposed project finance structure.OUTLOOKThe stable outlook reflects our view of steady growth of oil transshipment volumes handled by the port supporting an average legal DSCR of 2.0x for the life of the transaction, as well as the maintenance of all licenses and of the long-term O&M Agreement with Oiltanking. The stable outlook also incorporates the assumption of continuing degree of the current level of commitment from the ultimate shareholders to the Company and from AAMFB to the port of Açu´s operations.FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGWhile we do not expect a rating upgrade in the short to medium term given the stable outlook, higher transshipment volumes for a prolonged period or revenue stability supported by a larger portion of long-term take-or-pay contracts could trigger upward pressure on the rating. An upgrade would also require lower leverage profile, consistent with a higher rating category, such as DSCR above 2.5x.The rating could be downgraded if there is a sustained deterioration in the Company´s operating performance such that legal DSCR remains below 1.5x on sustained basis. Negative rating pressure could arise if (i) the expected proportion of long-term ToP volume declines, (ii) re-contracting the excess capacity at less favorable terms, or (iii) if there is a deterioration in the shareholder's or AAMFB commitment to the port operations that is detrimental to the credit quality of the Company. Also, negative pressure on the Notes rating would increase with Moody's perception of structural subordination arising from non-recourse debt issuance at permitted project finance subsidiaries of Açu Petroleo. Deterioration in Brazil´s sovereign credit quality Government of Brazil (Ba2 stable) could place also downward pressure on the rating as well as deterioration in the credit quality of the Eligible Credit Instrument "ECI" providers, which are local financial institutions or reversal of the anticipated cash flow benefits.COMPANY PROFILEThe Issuer is a private limited liability company incorporated and existing under Luxembourg, which is fully owned by Açu Petroleo. Since 2016, Açu owns and operates the largest private crude oil transshipment terminal in Brazil, the oil terminal (T-OIL) of the Port of Açu, which currently is the only private infrastructure in Brazil capable of receiving VLCC class ships -- with a cargo capacity of up to two million barrels. Açu Petroleo is part of the Port of Açu, a complex built and operated by Prumo Logística S.A. (not rated), located in the State of Rio de Janeiro, in Brazil. Its port license allows the movement of 1.2 million barrels per day (bpd) and the depth of the terminal is 25 meters. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2021, Açu Petroleo handled 325,000 bpd in 93 operations.The principal methodology used in this rating was Privately Managed Ports Methodology published in May 2021 and available at https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1129671. Alternatively, please see the Rating Methodologies page on www.moodys.com for a copy of this methodology.REGULATORY DISCLOSURESFor further specification of Moody's key rating assumptions and sensitivity analysis, see the sections Methodology Assumptions and Sensitivity to Assumptions in the disclosure form. Moody's Rating Symbols and Definitions can be found at: https://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_79004.For ratings issued on a program, series, category/class of debt or security this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to each rating of a subsequently issued bond or note of the same series, category/class of debt, security or pursuant to a program for which the ratings are derived exclusively from existing ratings in accordance with Moody's rating practices. For ratings issued on a support provider, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the credit rating action on the support provider and in relation to each particular credit rating action for securities that derive their credit ratings from the support provider's credit rating. For provisional ratings, this announcement provides certain regulatory disclosures in relation to the provisional rating assigned, and in relation to a definitive rating that may be assigned subsequent to the final issuance of the debt, in each case where the transaction structure and terms have not changed prior to the assignment of the definitive rating in a manner that would have affected the rating. For further information please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page for the respective issuer on www.moodys.com.For any affected securities or rated entities receiving direct credit support from the primary entity(ies) of this credit rating action, and whose ratings may change as a result of this credit rating action, the associated regulatory disclosures will be those of the guarantor entity. Exceptions to this approach exist for the following disclosures, if applicable to jurisdiction: Ancillary Services, Disclosure to rated entity, Disclosure from rated entity.The rating has been disclosed to the rated entity or its designated agent (s) and issued with no amendment resulting from that disclosure.This rating is solicited. Please refer to Moody's Policy for Designating and Assigning Unsolicited Credit Ratings available on its website www.moodys.com.Regulatory disclosures contained in this press release apply to the credit rating and, if applicable, the related rating outlook or rating review.Moody's general principles for assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks in our credit analysis can be found at http://www.moodys.com/researchdocumentcontentpage.aspx?docid=PBC_1288235.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the EU and is endorsed by Moody's Deutschland GmbH, An der Welle 5, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany, in accordance with Art.4 paragraph 3 of the Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on Credit Rating Agencies. Further information on the EU endorsement status and on the Moody's office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.The Global Scale Credit Rating on this Credit Rating Announcement was issued by one of Moody's affiliates outside the UK and is endorsed by Moody's Investors Service Limited, One Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5FA under the law applicable to credit rating agencies in the UK. Further information on the UK endorsement status and on the Moody's office that issued the credit rating is available on www.moodys.com.Please see www.moodys.com for any updates on changes to the lead rating analyst and to the Moody's legal entity that has issued the rating.Please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for additional regulatory disclosures for each credit rating. Aneliza Crnugelj Asst Vice President - Analyst Infra Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 0 800 891 2518 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Cristiane Spercel Senior Vice President/Manager Infra Finance Group JOURNALISTS: 0 800 891 2518 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 Releasing Office: Moody's Investors Service, Inc. 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 U.S.A. JOURNALISTS: 1 212 553 0376 Client Service: 1 212 553 1653 © 2022 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S CREDIT RATINGS AFFILIATES ARE THEIR CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (COLLECTIVELY, “PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE SUCH CURRENT OPINIONS. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT OR IMPAIRMENT. SEE APPLICABLE MOODY’S RATING SYMBOLS AND DEFINITIONS PUBLICATION FOR INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF CONTRACTUAL FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS ADDRESSED BY MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS, NON-CREDIT ASSESSMENTS (“ASSESSMENTS”), AND OTHER OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. AND/OR ITS AFFILIATES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS DO NOT COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS AND OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLISHES ITS PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS, AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS OR PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS, ASSESSMENTS, OTHER OPINIONS AND PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK.All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing its Publications.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S.To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information.NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY CREDIT RATING, ASSESSMENT, OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,000 to approximately $5,000,000. MCO and Moody’s Investors Service also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings and credit rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold credit ratings from Moody’s Investors Service and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors.Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any credit rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for credit ratings opinions and services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY100,000 to approximately JPY550,000,000.MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. ​

Advertisement