ICC takes action in fresh fallout to World Cup final 'disgrace'
The International Cricket Council has announced plans to change the rules of the super over which saw England win the World Cup on boundaries.
Eoin Morgan's men secured a first World Cup triumph by the narrowest of all margins at Lord's in July, when both sides had been tied at 241 runs following the regulation 50 overs.
[Join or create a 2019 Yahoo Fantasy Basketball league for free today]
England then went on to make 15 in their six-ball shoot-out, which was matched by New Zealand, meaning the hosts were crowned world champions after having scored more boundaries, fours and sixes, during the match.
The detail of the tie-break regulations - which had only occurred 11 times in international history and never before in a one-day international - drew waves of criticism.
Since events of the summer, the Big Bash tournament has amended the rules for their next competition.
On Monday, the world governing body also confirmed changes, which will now see any super over in a final repeated until one side has more runs.
"Following on from a recommendation from the ICC Cricket Committee, the Chief Executives' Committee agreed that use of the super over as a way to decide results at ICC events will be retained," an ICC statement read following a board meeting in Dubai.
"Both the Cricket Committee and CEC agreed it was an exciting and engaging conclusion to the game and will remain in place covering all games at both ODI and T20 World Cups.
"In group stages, if the Super Over is tied the match will be tied.
"In semi-finals and finals, there is one change to the super over regulation in keeping with the basic principle of scoring more runs than the opponent to win, the super over will be repeated until one team has more runs than the other."
Fans rage over boundary countback ’disgrace’
Fans were fuming at the time of England’s win, with some branding the boundary countback rule a ‘disgrace’.
Joke of a way to finish a world cup. I'm sure there was a spare day for a rematch. A game of that standing shouldn't be decided by super over or number of boundaries. Didn't agree with NZ v India semi final being played over 2 days either.
— Matthew Mcdonald (@ellesmere73) July 15, 2019
If the final of a World cup is decided by which team hit more boundaries then you know that @ICC is a joke. NZ didn't deserve this.#WorldCupfinal
— Parin (@im_Parin) July 14, 2019
If Wimbledon final had to be decided on the number of aces hit, Federer would have won. But they kept going till they had a proper winner. Unlike @ICC and their 'one who hits more boundaries will win' joke.
— टिंकूआ के पप्पा (@Bihar_ke_lala) July 14, 2019
How do you decide a world cup final on the basis of boundaries. This is an absolute disgrace. @BLACKCAPS did not deserve this. It was a tie and thats how it should be. How can you justify boundaries as a way of winning a game. A tie is a tie. @icc you suck big time. #CWC19Final
— Rannel Sheldon Moras (@VancityRan) July 14, 2019
Hands down that was the greatest ever World Cup final. Had everything. Anybody's game in the end but @ICC need to revamp the rulebook. The DLS method and now England winning on more boundaries scored is somewhat a disgrace. Kane Williamson rightfully player of the tournament.
— Burhan Ali (@burhan_7ali) July 15, 2019
Yes obviously where one team beats another team on the basis of no of boundaries hit.. Till yesterday every final had the winner win by wickets or runs not by boundaries so yes he is right to say that never will we see like this happen again.. Disgrace #ICC
— maddy (@Madhurj78928348) July 15, 2019